They feature more shaders 3×16 instead of 2×16 , more texture units 8 instead of 4 and SFUs per streaming multi-processor SM. CoD Modern Warfare 2 Intel Extreme Graphics 2. However, the laptop manufacturers need to implement it and it cannot be upgraded. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
|Date Added:||13 January 2018|
|File Size:||35.18 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Less demanding games should run in high detail settings. They feature more shaders 3×16 instead of 2x16more texture units 8 instead of 4 and SFUs per streaming multi-processor SM.
Benchmarks and comparison charts on the 3D performance can be found below. For example, the stream processor can considerably faster encode videos than a fast CPU can. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems.
Except for the memory controllers the GF can basically be considered geforce gt 420m cuda halved GF Due 420 the higher shader count of the GT M, the performance could improve with future driver releases.
GeForce GT M | GeForce
Furthermore, the GPU is able to decode two p streams simultaneously e. GeForce GT M compare. It is based on the GF core, which is related to the Fermi architecture.
Furthermore, the M series supports Optimus to automatically switch between the integrated graphics card from Intel and the Nvidia GPU. In contrast to the GF, which was designed for professional applications, these chips target the consumer geforce gt 420m cuda.
Intel HD Graphics Windows 7 Experience Index – Graphics.
PassMark – GeForce GT M – Price performance comparison
CoD Modern Warfare 2 Intel Extreme Graphics 2. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU.
Due to the different shader architectures and the higher clock rate of the shader domain, the core count can not be directly compared to AMD cores of the Radeon series e. However, in worst case scenarios the performance can also be worse than of the Geforce gt 420m cuda and its predecessors. In contrast to the GT Mthe card features the full 96 shader cores.
SPECviewperf 11 – Ensight x The best resolution geforce gt 420m cuda choose is about x due to the limited performance. Because the GeForce GT M features a new architecture, the performance is not comparable to older chips with a similar core count.
GeForce GT 420 – OEM
Therefore, the architecture is not comparable to the old GT e. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review geforce gt 420m cuda.
SPECviewperf 11 – Maya x SPECviewperf 11 – Lightwave x Bad Company 2 The gaming performance of the GT M is sufficient for medium geforce gt 420m cuda settings in modern games like Battlefield Bad Company 2. In theory, the shaders can thereby be utilized more efficiently and the performance per core is improved.
As geforce gt 420m cuda cda still only 2 warp schedulers versus 3 shader groupsNvidia now uses superscalar execution to use the higher amount of shaders per SM more efficiently. However, the laptop manufacturers need to implement it and it cannot be upgraded.
SPECviewperf 11 – Tcvis x Performance Because the GeForce Geforce gt 420m cuda M features a new architecture, the performance is not comparable to older chips with a similar core count.